Malum In Se and Malum Prohibitum

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

1. Which description best captures an act malum in se?
2. Which description best captures malum prohibitum?
3. Does placing an offense in a special penal statute necessarily make it malum prohibitum?
4. A prosecutor asserts that plunder requires no criminal intent solely because it is punished by RA 7080 rather than the …
5. A valid regulatory penal statute expressly requires that an accused knowingly perform a prohibited act. The prosecution…
6. A driver is prosecuted for a felony through reckless imprudence. The evidence is offered to establish the legally requi…
7. Assume a valid regulatory prohibition is properly classified as malum prohibitum, requires voluntary performance of a s…
8. Distinguish malum in se from malum prohibitum without equating the categories mechanically with the RPC and special law…
9. Explain why saying that criminal intent is unnecessary in a malum-prohibitum offense does not mean that every element, …
10. Relate the mala-in-se/mala-prohibita distinction to Article 3’s recognition of dolo and culpa.
11. Does calling BP22 malum prohibitum remove Section 1’s express knowledge requirement?
12. Is proof of a separate purpose to defraud identical to proof of BP22’s stated knowledge of insufficient funds?