Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Retroactive Effect of Penal Laws

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

An offender has two qualifying prior convictions and is found guilty a third time of a listed offense within the statutory ten-year framework. The complete amended Article 62(5) definition is established. The offender invokes only Article 22’s general favorable-retroactivity rule and says its express exception may never be considered. Which is correct?
  1. The incorporated habitual-criminal exception must be applied on the established statutory facts
  2. Article 22 contains no exception
  3. Every third conviction guarantees favorable retroactivity
  4. The definition applies only to prison uniforms
  5. The prosecutor may ignore all statutory conditions

Legal references

  • Revised Penal Code, Articles 8, 10 and 22, as applicable: https://lawphil.net/statutes/acts/act1930/act_3815_1930.html
  • RA 18, Section 1, amended Article 62(5) habitual-delinquent definition: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1946/ra_18_1946.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.