Practice question
An electronically signed document is offered despite known defects making reliance on its signature unreasonable. The proponent claims section 9’s presumptions are absolute. Which is correct?
- All electronic signatures are irrebuttably valid
- Knowledge of defects is irrelevant
- The statute qualifies the presumptions where the relying person knows or has notice of defects or reliance is unreasonable
- Any typed name overrides every objection
- Only the computer’s purchase date matters
Legal references
- https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2000/ra_8792_2000.html — RA 8792, sections 6–13
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.