Practice question
A person possesses material solely for a legitimate investigation within the express Section8 safe-harbor exception of RA11930. All safe-harbor facts are established and no separate violation exists. Does Section9(c) automatically turn that protected act into an AMLA predicate?
- No; the predicate clause addresses violations, and the stipulated protected act is not such a violation
- Yes; every protected investigative act is automatically criminal
- Yes; the safe harbor is erased by every reference to AMLA
- No; because no RA11930 offense can ever be a predicate
- Yes; any possession by any person is necessarily outside Section8
Legal references
- RA11930: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2022/ra_11930_2022.html Sections8 and9(c).
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.