Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Topic

Predicate Offenses (Unlawful Activities) (See also RA 11930, Sec. 9(c), and RA 12312, Sec. 8)

Explore Predicate Offenses (Unlawful Activities) (See also RA 11930, Sec. 9(c), and RA 12312, Sec. 8) in Money Laundering for the Philippine Bar. Browse…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. What AMLA status does RA 12312 section 8 assign to violations of that Act? Multiple Choice Easy
  2. Which RA 11930 violations does section 9(c) expressly treat as AMLA unlawful activities? Multiple Choice Easy
  3. For the specified tax predicate added by RA 11521, the deficiency basic tax in the final assessment must be what amount? Multiple Choice Easy
  4. A person argues that offshore-gaming violations cannot be AMLA predicates because they were not in the original 2001 li… Multiple Choice Medium
  5. A prosecutor invokes RA 11930 section 9(c) after establishing a section 4 violation. Must the violation be excluded as … Multiple Choice Medium
  6. A final assessment shows P26,000,000 deficiency basic tax for one tax type in a taxable year, but no competent-authorit… Multiple Choice Hard
  7. Deficiency basic tax is exactly P25,000,000 for a particular tax type and year. Other requirements of the specific RA 1… Multiple Choice Hard
  8. Explain the AMLA predicate significance of RA 12312 section 8 and RA 11930 section 9(c). Essay Medium
  9. State the principal conditions of the tax predicate added by RA 11521. Essay Medium
  10. Why is it incorrect to treat every illegal act as an AMLA predicate without identifying the governing legal designation? Essay Medium
  11. Which theft offense is expressly listed in AMLA Section3(i) as amended by RA10365? Multiple Choice Easy
  12. Which statute supplies the plunder predicate expressly named in AMLA Section3(i)? Multiple Choice Easy