Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Predicate Offenses (Unlawful Activities) (See also RA 11930, Sec. 9(c), and RA 12312, Sec. 8)

Multiple Choice Hard Jurisprudence

Practice question

A final assessment shows P26,000,000 deficiency basic tax for one tax type in a taxable year, but no competent-authority probable-cause finding and no fraud, wilful misrepresentation, or malicious-intent finding are established. Does the amount alone complete the specified RA 11521 tax predicate?
  1. Yes, amount alone always suffices
  2. No, the statute adds the specified probable-cause and culpable-intent findings
  3. Yes, every assessment is automatically laundering
  4. Yes, the taxpayer’s bank account alone supplies the missing findings
  5. No tax offense can ever be an AMLA predicate

Legal references

  • https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2025/ra_12312_2025.html — RA 12312, section 8
  • https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2022/ra_11930_2022.html — RA 11930, section 9(c)
  • https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/2/92723 — RA 11521, section 2 amending AMLA section 3(i)

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.