Philippine Bar review · Topic

Indirect Liability for Intentional Acts

Explore Indirect Liability for Intentional Acts in In General for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Elcano v. Hill explains that culpa aquiliana can include which acts?
  2. Does proof that an actor intended the harmful conduct automatically establish an employer's liability for it?
  3. What does Article 2177 prevent when the same intentional act supports distinct civil bases?
  4. An agency argues that a guard's criminal conviction necessarily makes every separate civil claim against the agency onl…
  5. An actionable intentional wrong by an employee occurs within the scope required for the asserted Article 2180 claim. Th…
  6. A security guard, while carrying out assigned security functions, commits an actionable shooting. In the separate quasi…
  7. An employee commits a private intentional assault during a wholly personal dispute, unrelated to any assigned task. The…
  8. Explain Elcano's intentional-act principle while avoiding automatic application of its historical family-law discussion…
  9. Why does an intentional act require separate analysis of the direct actor and a person alleged to be responsible under …
  10. Explain Safeguard's distinction between quasi-delict liability and an employer's subsidiary responsibility under the Pe…
  11. In Safeguard, what controls the nature of the asserted civil action rather than a later label in argument?
  12. Under Safeguard, does a separate quasi-delict claim against an employer necessarily require prior exhaustion of the emp…