Philippine Bar review · Topic
Indirect Liability for Intentional Acts
Explore Indirect Liability for Intentional Acts in In General for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Elcano v. Hill explains that culpa aquiliana can include which acts?
- Does proof that an actor intended the harmful conduct automatically establish an employer's liability for it?
- What does Article 2177 prevent when the same intentional act supports distinct civil bases?
- An agency argues that a guard's criminal conviction necessarily makes every separate civil claim against the agency onl…
- An actionable intentional wrong by an employee occurs within the scope required for the asserted Article 2180 claim. Th…
- A security guard, while carrying out assigned security functions, commits an actionable shooting. In the separate quasi…
- An employee commits a private intentional assault during a wholly personal dispute, unrelated to any assigned task. The…
- Explain Elcano's intentional-act principle while avoiding automatic application of its historical family-law discussion…
- Why does an intentional act require separate analysis of the direct actor and a person alleged to be responsible under …
- Explain Safeguard's distinction between quasi-delict liability and an employer's subsidiary responsibility under the Pe…
- In Safeguard, what controls the nature of the asserted civil action rather than a later label in argument?
- Under Safeguard, does a separate quasi-delict claim against an employer necessarily require prior exhaustion of the emp…