Philippine Bar review · Topic

Intervening Cause

Explore Intervening Cause in Distinguished from for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Does every event occurring between negligent conduct and injury necessarily qualify as an efficient intervening cause?
  2. Which description best identifies an efficient intervening cause in the cited framework?
  3. How is a foreseeable response to the very risk created by the defendant generally evaluated?
  4. A negligently parked obstruction creates a collision risk. A road user’s ordinary, foreseeable avoidance response leads…
  5. A defendant identifies a later storm but offers no analysis of its independence or of the defendant’s continuing neglig…
  6. An original negligent act merely furnishes the occasion. A subsequent distinct, unrelated act independently produces th…
  7. A defendant argues that the mere involvement of another person’s intentional act necessarily severs causation. The fact…
  8. Distinguish an intervening occurrence from an efficient intervening cause. Why is chronology alone insufficient?
  9. A defendant invokes strong winds and a displaced object as an automatic superseding cause. Explain Davao del Norte’s ca…
  10. Explain why a prior act that only furnishes an occasion may be legally remote when a distinct unrelated efficient cause…
  11. For an asserted later event, what does the efficient-intervening-cause inquiry require beyond timing?
  12. Can a response set in operation by the original negligence remain within its causal sequence?