Acts Contrary to Morals, Good Customs, or Public Policy

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

1. What state of conduct does Article 21 expressly require?
2. Which standards does Article 21 identify?
3. What is Article 21’s stated consequence for its established wrongful conduct?
4. A defendant deliberately inflicts proven injury through conduct established as contrary to good customs. The defendant …
5. A claimant proves only an inadvertent harmless mistake and cites Article 21 as an automatic source of moral damages. Wh…
6. A business deliberately stages a humiliating public incident against a customer for a vindictive purpose. The claimant …
7. A claimant alleges that conduct is immoral solely because it frustrated a personal preference. No willful injury or leg…
8. Distinguish Article 21 from a requirement that every wrong be separately punishable as a crime.
9. Why does subjective offense alone not establish every Article 21 claim?
10. Explain the difference between Article 20’s negligence wording and Article 21’s willful-injury wording.
11. Is a mere breach of promise to marry, without independently actionable circumstances, itself an actionable wrong under …
12. What distinguished the actionable conduct in Wassmer from a mere change of mind about marriage?