Philippine Bar review · Topic
Culpa aquiliana vs. Culpa contractual vs. Culpa criminal
Explore Culpa aquiliana vs. Culpa contractual vs. Culpa criminal in Principles for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Which source primarily characterizes culpa contractual?
- What does Article 2177 prohibit despite recognizing separate negligence-based civil responsibilities?
- What is culpa aquiliana generally associated with?
- A claimant proves only nonperformance of an agreed service, and the complained-of conduct would not independently be an…
- Two parties have a contract, but one commits a negligent act that would independently be actionable as a tort even with…
- A negligent act supports both a properly established quasi-delict claim and civil liability arising from penal negligen…
- A repair company has a contract with a shop owner. While working, its employee negligently drops equipment onto a passe…
- Distinguish culpa contractual from an independently actionable quasi-delict where the parties also have a contract.
- Explain the distinction and no-double-recovery rule in Article 2177.
- Why must the source of duty and causal injury be identified before classifying a negligence claim?
- In the Article2180 employer quasi-delict framework, what statutory defense is relevant?
- Does Barredo characterize the properly established employer quasi-delict liability as merely the same subsidiary liabil…