Philippine Bar review · Topic

Strict Liability

Page 2 of practice questions on Strict Liability in Classification of Torts. Browse published questions and explore related topics for Philippine Bar review.

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Does Article 2183 confine animal responsibility to the registered owner?
  2. An importer proves that the particular item was never placed on the market by it. The Article 97 claimant relies solely…
  3. A service is alleged defective only because a newer technique was later introduced. No safety defect is established. Wh…
  4. A consumer suffers injury from a service lacking safety rightfully expected in the stated circumstances. Defect and cau…
  5. A nonowner borrows and uses an animal which causes proved damage. No force majeure or injured-person fault is establish…
  6. Explain Article 99’s service-defect standard and defenses.
  7. An Article 97 defendant proves it did not place the item on the market. Must it also prove that the consumer was solely…
  8. Compare ownership and use under Article 2183 using a borrowed animal.