Philippine Bar review · Topic
Strict Liability
Explore Strict Liability in Classification of Torts for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- What does strict liability mean in the statutory settings examined here?
- Whom does Article 2183 identify as responsible for damage caused by an animal?
- Under RA 7394 Article 97, what is the fault rule for the specified manufacturer, producer, or importer concerning quali…
- A dog escapes from its possessor and causes proved injury. No force majeure or fault of the injured person is establish…
- A tame animal causes proved injury attributable to it. The defendant is its possessor, and no statutory exonerating cau…
- A consumer product placed on the market by its manufacturer injures a consumer. The manufacturer proves under Article 9…
- A safe consumer product is marketed. A later model offers better quality. No unsafe condition, inadequate hazard inform…
- Explain why Article 2183 liability is described as independent of negligence while still requiring a legally relevant c…
- A product manufacturer argues that a consumer must always prove negligent manufacture. State Article 97’s independent-o…
- Compare a rebuttable presumption of negligent driving with Article 2183 animal liability and Article 97 product liabili…
- Under Consumer Act Article 99, a service supplier’s liability for qualifying defect-caused consumer damage is independe…
- Which Article 97 defense concerns whether the defendant introduced the product into commerce?