Philippine Bar review · Topic

Strict Liability

Explore Strict Liability in Classification of Torts for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. What does strict liability mean in the statutory settings examined here?
  2. Whom does Article 2183 identify as responsible for damage caused by an animal?
  3. Under RA 7394 Article 97, what is the fault rule for the specified manufacturer, producer, or importer concerning quali…
  4. A dog escapes from its possessor and causes proved injury. No force majeure or fault of the injured person is establish…
  5. A tame animal causes proved injury attributable to it. The defendant is its possessor, and no statutory exonerating cau…
  6. A consumer product placed on the market by its manufacturer injures a consumer. The manufacturer proves under Article 9…
  7. A safe consumer product is marketed. A later model offers better quality. No unsafe condition, inadequate hazard inform…
  8. Explain why Article 2183 liability is described as independent of negligence while still requiring a legally relevant c…
  9. A product manufacturer argues that a consumer must always prove negligent manufacture. State Article 97’s independent-o…
  10. Compare a rebuttable presumption of negligent driving with Article 2183 animal liability and Article 97 product liabili…
  11. Under Consumer Act Article 99, a service supplier’s liability for qualifying defect-caused consumer damage is independe…
  12. Which Article 97 defense concerns whether the defendant introduced the product into commerce?