Philippine Bar review · Topic
Distinguished from Accion In Rem Verso
Explore Distinguished from Accion In Rem Verso in Solutio Indebiti for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Which is the specific basis of solutio indebiti under Article 2154?
- What feature makes accion in rem verso subsidiary?
- Under Article 22, what must be absent for the benefit at another's expense to support restitution?
- A payer accidentally sends a second payment of a debt already fully paid. The recipient has no remaining right to deman…
- A supplier has an obtainable action under a valid contract for the exact unpaid amount but prefers to invoke accion in …
- A claimant says a defendant benefited from delivered equipment and therefore must pay under Article 22. The evidence es…
- A recipient proves that a transfer was knowingly made as a valid gratuitous gift, not as mistaken payment, and no other…
- Compare the specific requirements of solutio indebiti with the broader but subsidiary action based on Article 22.
- A claimant can establish a mistaken duplicate payment under Article 2154. Explain why the relationship to Article 22 do…
- Explain why benefit to the defendant and loss to the claimant do not alone establish accion in rem verso.
- For a payment of something that had never been due, what evidentiary rule does Article 2163 supply?
- Under Article 2157, what is the responsibility of two or more payees for a proved undue payment?