Philippine Bar review · Topic

Distinguished from Accion In Rem Verso

Explore Distinguished from Accion In Rem Verso in Solutio Indebiti for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Which is the specific basis of solutio indebiti under Article 2154?
  2. What feature makes accion in rem verso subsidiary?
  3. Under Article 22, what must be absent for the benefit at another's expense to support restitution?
  4. A payer accidentally sends a second payment of a debt already fully paid. The recipient has no remaining right to deman…
  5. A supplier has an obtainable action under a valid contract for the exact unpaid amount but prefers to invoke accion in …
  6. A claimant says a defendant benefited from delivered equipment and therefore must pay under Article 22. The evidence es…
  7. A recipient proves that a transfer was knowingly made as a valid gratuitous gift, not as mistaken payment, and no other…
  8. Compare the specific requirements of solutio indebiti with the broader but subsidiary action based on Article 22.
  9. A claimant can establish a mistaken duplicate payment under Article 2154. Explain why the relationship to Article 22 do…
  10. Explain why benefit to the defendant and loss to the claimant do not alone establish accion in rem verso.
  11. For a payment of something that had never been due, what evidentiary rule does Article 2163 supply?
  12. Under Article 2157, what is the responsibility of two or more payees for a proved undue payment?