Practice question
A rival enters ordinary negotiations after the former agreement has conclusively expired. A claimant relies solely on inducing breach of that expired contract and proves no continuing obligation. What element is missing on those facts?
- The rival’s favorite price
- The rival’s nationality
- The color of the agreement
- A valid subsisting contractual obligation of the kind alleged to have been induced into breach
- A criminal conviction in every case
Legal references
- Tuna Processors, Inc. v. Frescomar Corp., G.R. Nos.226445 and 226631, February 27, 2024, MAIN en banc decision, tortious interference: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2024/feb2024/gr_226445_2024.html
- Lagon v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.119107, March 18, 2005, MAIN decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2005/mar2005/gr_119107_2005.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.