Practice question
An employer invokes an unproved foreign statute to justify a deduction. It presents only a contract saying a foreign legal system governs, with no competent content of the alleged statute. Under the ordinary doctrine, which is best?
- The clause conclusively proves the employer's description of every statute.
- The employer may choose any foreign rule after the dispute.
- All deductions become automatically lawful.
- A governing-law clause alone does not supply the missing foreign statutory content; apply the appropriate presumed-identity analysis.
- Foreign law is whatever the contract's title suggests.
Legal references
- Bison Management v. AAA, G.R.256540, February14,2024, MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2024/feb2024/gr_256540_2024.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.