Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Nominal Damages

Multiple Choice Hard Jurisprudence

Practice question

A litigant seeks to copy Paulino’s nominal amount into a different dispute without identifying an invaded right or relevant circumstances. Which is sound?
  1. Citation of a number proves every rights violation.
  2. The case’s amount alone does not supply the missing basis or assessment.
  3. Any employment complaint automatically receives that figure.
  4. The amount is a filing-fee refund.
  5. All disputed rights are conclusively violated.

Legal references

  • Civil Code Articles 2206, 2208 and 2216-2225: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1949/ra_386_1949.html
  • Paulino v. Sutherland Global Services, G.R. No. 262564, August 6, 2025, main decision: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/1/70181
  • University of Southeastern Philippines v. Sarate, G.R. No. 247617, November 25, 2025, en banc main decision, Part IV: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/1/70367

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.