Practice question
A nominee has a proved conviction involving moral turpitude. The court considers fitness under Rule78 Section1. Nominee says this conviction is categorically outside the rule because residence and adulthood alone suffice. Which is correct?
- The express fitness provision must also be applied
- Residence and age exhaust every condition
- The conviction is expressly protected
- Only the nominee may decide fitness
- The will eliminates every judicial qualification
Legal references
- Rules74 and76–79, relevant procedural provisions (current competent court assumed, without obsolete court labels or monetary jurisdiction): https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_72-109_proceedings.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.