Practice question
After notice and hearing on a proper restoration petition, the court finds the adult no longer incompetent. Guardian demands indefinite continuation solely for convenience, without another legal basis. Which is correct?
- Rule97 directs adjudgment of competency and cessation of guardianship
- Convenience alone overrides the finding
- The guardian owns the ward’s property
- A former finding can never change
- Only the guardian chooses when it ends
Legal references
- Rules91,93,97 and102, relevant continuing provisions: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_72-109_proceedings.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.