Practice question
A city proposes using the escheated estate solely as a private gratuity for a favored official, identifying no lawful public-school or charitable purpose under Section3. It says assignment creates unrestricted private spending rights. Which is sound?
- Assignment makes all personal uses lawful
- Section3 states the prescribed public beneficiaries and purpose
- The official automatically is sole heir
- Only the amount matters
- Public purpose disappears after judgment
Legal references
- Rules91,93,97 and102, relevant continuing provisions: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_72-109_proceedings.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.