Practice question
A private factory’s unlawful discharge is shown by material evidence to threaten inhabitants’ health in two cities. The factory argues kalikasan is unavailable because there is no already completed personal injury and it is not a government agency. Which is best?
- Neither objection is categorical: threatened violation and private actors are expressly covered if all elements are established
- Only completed deaths qualify
- Only government respondents qualify
- Evidence of unlawful discharge automatically proves every requested remedy
- The petitioner must first obtain the factory’s consent
Legal references
- AM09-6-8-SC Rule7 Sections1–2 and15: https://lawphil.net/courts/supreme/am/am_09-6-8-sc_2010.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.