Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Temporary Environmental Protection Order (TEPO)

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

Residents obtain an ex parte TEPO against an urgently harmful discharge. The assigned court holds the required summary hearing within 72 hours and extends the TEPO until termination of the case. Later, credible monitoring shows the acts subject to the order have ceased and circumstances warrant lifting it. Which statement is correct?
  1. The court cannot review it until final judgment
  2. Only the executive judge can lift it
  3. The assigned court periodically monitors the acts and may lift the TEPO as circumstances warrant
  4. The order becomes a permanent EPO merely because it was extended
  5. Only the residents can terminate the order

Legal references

  • A.M. No. 09-6-8-SC, Rule 2, Sections 8–9.
  • Reviewed primary authority, Rule 2, Sections 8–9: https://lawphil.net/courts/supreme/am/am_09-6-8-sc_2010.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.