Practice question
A plant moves to dissolve a TEPO. Its grounds are supported by affidavits; the residents oppose by affidavits. After hearing, the court finds continuation would cause the plant irreparable damage while the residents can be fully compensated for their resulting damages. What additional condition does Rule 2, Section 9 require for dissolution on this basis?
- An applicant's bond twice the plant's assets
- A sufficient bond posted by the party or person enjoined
- A final criminal acquittal
- Unanimous approval of all residents
- A declaration that all environmental laws are inapplicable
Legal references
- A.M. No. 09-6-8-SC, Rule 2, Sections 8–9.
- Reviewed primary authority, Rule 2, Sections 8–9: https://lawphil.net/courts/supreme/am/am_09-6-8-sc_2010.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.