Practice question
An activist supplies detailed evidence of public insurgent-labeling, repeated following, and killings of associates named on the same posters. A judge rejects the petition solely because the activist is alive and has not disappeared. Assess that reason.
- Correct, threats are never covered.
- The court must instead convict the officials immediately.
- Only damages can ever address these allegations.
- Mistaken: covered threats may warrant issuance and examination, without automatically establishing final entitlement.
- The court must ignore surrounding circumstances.
Legal references
- https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2023/jul2023/gr_254753_2023.html — Deduro v. Vinoya, G.R. 254753, July 4, 2023, main opinion; Amparo Rule sections 1, 6 and 18.
- https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2018/jan2018/gr_221862_2018.html — Bautista v. Dannug-Salucon, G.R. 221862, January 23, 2018, main opinion; Amparo Rule section 17.
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.