Practice question
A petitioner argues that referring to Rule 65 in Rule 64 means every special Rule 64 provision is erased. Which is correct?
- The reference abolishes Rule 64 entirely.
- Rule 65 applies subject to Rule 64's express modifications, including its filing-period formula.
- Only the petitioner's chosen rule matters.
- No review is possible because the two rules differ.
- The commission may privately rewrite the Supreme Court's rules.
Legal references
- https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_1-71_civil.html — Rule 64, Sections 2–3 and 8.
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.