Philippine Bar review · Topic

Stages of Expropriation

Explore Stages of Expropriation in Expropriation (Rule 67; RA 10752, as amended by RA 12289) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. What is ordinarily addressed in the first stage of expropriation?
  2. What is the second stage principally concerned with?
  3. Under Rule67 Section5, how many competent and disinterested commissioners may the court appoint to ascertain and report…
  4. The court rejects objections to the plaintiff’s authority and issues an order of expropriation. Must that order alone e…
  5. A plaintiff claims its provisional possession deposit ends the need for a compensation hearing because the owner withdr…
  6. An agency obtains provisional possession, then insists that challenges to its authority can never be considered because…
  7. Commissioners submit a report that lacks an adequate valuation basis. The agency says the judge must adopt it because c…
  8. Describe the two stages of expropriation and why the possession deposit does not merge them.
  9. Explain the commissioners’ role when determining compensation.
  10. An agency equates a provisional deposit with a final compensation judgment. Explain the error.
  11. May an aggrieved party appeal a final order sustaining the right to expropriate before the later compensation determina…
  12. Does that first-stage appeal automatically prevent the court from determining just compensation?