Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Certiorari, Prohibition, and Mandamus (Rule 65)

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

A private beneficiary is interested in sustaining a challenged judicial proceeding but is omitted because petitioner names only the judge. Which is correct?
  1. No adverse person may defend
  2. Only the judge can ever be respondent
  3. The beneficiary is necessarily a witness only
  4. Section5 requires joinder of the interested private respondent
  5. Private interests disappear in certiorari

Legal references

  • Rules1 and62–70, special civil actions and specific procedural provisions: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_1-71_civil.html
  • 2019 amendments AM19-10-20-SC, retained special civil action provisions: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-10-20-sc_2019.html
  • AM07-7-12-SC, December4,2007, amended Rule65: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_07-7-12-sc_2007.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.