Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Certiorari, Prohibition, and Mandamus (Rule 65)

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

A judge impleaded as public respondent receives no specific direction to participate and proposes an advocacy brief defending the ruling. Which does Section5 ordinarily provide?
  1. No rule distinguishes their roles
  2. The judge must always become chief advocate
  3. Every judge may privately decide the higher petition
  4. The petitioner appoints the judge’s counsel
  5. The private respondents defend; public participation requires specific direction

Legal references

  • Rules1 and62–70, special civil actions and specific procedural provisions: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_1-71_civil.html
  • 2019 amendments AM19-10-20-SC, retained special civil action provisions: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-10-20-sc_2019.html
  • AM07-7-12-SC, December4,2007, amended Rule65: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_07-7-12-sc_2007.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.