Philippine Bar review · Topic
Replevin (Rule 60)
Explore Replevin (Rule 60) in PROVISIONAL REMEDIES for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- What property is the subject of the recovery-of-possession remedy in Rule 60?
- When may the party seek provisional delivery under Rule 60, Section 1?
- What applicant's bond does Rule 60, Section 2 require?
- An applicant is not the owner but claims a legally established right to possess the described personal property. Does S…
- Property is held under a writ of execution. The replevin applicant simply ignores that custody in the affidavit. Which …
- The sheriff takes property under a replevin writ and immediately hands it to the applicant, claiming seizure itself con…
- After trial, the court finds the defendant entitled to the personal property's possession, but physical delivery can no…
- Identify the matters the Rule 60 applicant's affidavit must establish. Explain why simply stating I own it does not sat…
- Distinguish the applicant's bond from the adverse party's return-of-property bond under Rule 60. May the adverse party …
- Explain why a replevin writ's provisional delivery does not conclusively settle the main action. What judgment does Sec…
- Who may supply the Rule60 applicant’s factual affidavit besides the applicant?
- After lawful replevin taking, where must the sheriff keep the property?