Practice question
Does the absence of provisional deposit from the enumerated Rules57–61 alone establish that courts can never issue it?
- No; Guerrero Estate recognizes its distinct inherent-power basis
- Yes; the list alone defeats every deposit order
- Yes; Rule135 has no relevance
- Yes; all court custody is unlawful
- Yes; only a private bank may preserve disputed funds
Legal references
- Guerrero Estate v Leviste GR253428 February16,2022 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2022/feb2022/gr_253428_2022.html
- Lorenzo Shipping v Villarin GR175727/178713 March6,2019 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2019/mar2019/gr_175727_2019.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.