Philippine Bar review · Topic

Preliminary Injunction vs. Temporary Restraining Order vs. Status Quo Ante Order

Explore Preliminary Injunction vs. Temporary Restraining Order vs. Status Quo Ante Order in Preliminary Injunction (Rule 58) for the Philippine Bar. Browse…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Which ordinarily distinguishes a preliminary injunction from a final injunction?
  2. An ordinary Rule58 TRO issued by the Court of Appeals is effective for what period from service, absent a different gov…
  3. Under Rule58 Section5, a TRO issued by the Supreme Court or a member thereof is effective until when?
  4. An RTC’s ordinary twenty-day TRO expires without issuance of a preliminary injunction. May the court renew the TRO on e…
  5. An extreme-urgency TRO issues ex parte for seventy-two hours under Section5. Does a later extension permit twenty addit…
  6. A court labels an order status quo but directs a developer, which has never supplied security guards, to hire and maint…
  7. A litigant argues that a TRO conclusively adjudicates ownership because it temporarily prevents alteration of the prope…
  8. Compare the ordinary Rule58 TRO periods for a trial court, Court of Appeals, and Supreme Court.
  9. Why cannot an order imposing a new affirmative obligation evade injunction requirements merely by being called status q…
  10. Distinguish temporary restraint, preliminary injunction, and final injunction in relation to the main case.
  11. What distinguishes a preliminary mandatory injunction in Rule 58 Section 1?
  12. What historical situation supplies the status-quo reference used in the cited decisions?