Practice question
A defendant offers a counterbond but proves neither the specified irreparable harm to itself nor that the applicant can be fully compensated. It insists money security alone compels dissolution under Section6’s hardship clause. Which is correct?
- The clause’s additional factual predicates are not supplied merely by offering security
- A counterbond alone always compels dissolution
- All injunctions disappear on demand
- Only the bond’s color matters
- The merits are conclusively decided for the defendant
Legal references
- Rules of Court specified Rules58–61: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_1-71_civil.html Rule58 Sections2,6–9.
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.