Practice question
A wholesaler seeks attachment for a definite unpaid delivery price plus enormous projected profits from a proposed project never finalized. It supplies no concrete fraud beyond missed payment, and assumes lack of a previously negotiated security proves present insufficiency. Should the court simply attach the total demand?
- No; it must independently examine the statutory ground, security showing, and proper amount
- Yes, every amount pleaded must be attached
- Yes, anticipated profits are automatically liquidated
- Yes, historical absence of a bond proves every requisite
- No, attachment is abolished for all suppliers
Legal references
- Pilipinas Shell v. Pobre, G.R.259709, August30 2023: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2023/aug2023/gr_259709_2023.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.