Practice question
A creditor proves an unpaid debt but requests attachment merely because its debtor plans a legitimate foreign vacation. The affidavit admits there is no evidence of intent to defraud creditors and invokes only Section1(a). Which is best?
- Every international departure establishes fraud
- Travel alone does not establish Section1(a), which requires the specified fraudulent intent
- A passport replaces the required affidavit
- An unpaid balance eliminates every statutory condition
- The court must award the creditor all travel expenses
Legal references
- Rule57 Sections1(a) and3: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_1-71_civil.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.