Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Motion to Participate Through Videoconferencing (AM 24-11-02- SC, Sec. 5)

Multiple Choice Hard Jurisprudence

Practice question

For a June 2026 criminal hearing involving direct confrontation of a prosecution witness, defense counsel files a timely technically supported Section 5 motion. Counsel alone signs a statement that the accused need not execute any waiver because online participation automatically waives face-to-face confrontation. Which is best?
  1. The motion must address the accused’s informed written waiver required for that confrontation
  2. Counsel’s unilateral statement automatically satisfies every waiver requirement
  3. No waiver can ever be required for videoconferencing
  4. Every minor criminal incident necessarily requires the same waiver regardless of confrontation
  5. Technical readiness conclusively replaces constitutional safeguards

Legal references

  • AM 24-11-02-SC, Sections 1(d), 4 and 34: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/11/101170

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.