Practice question
Heirs plan a Rule 74 extrajudicial-settlement deed. They admit that a valid will exists, a creditor's unpaid estate debt is outstanding, and one heir disputes the proposed division. They ask counsel to insert boilerplate stating no will, no debts, and unanimous agreement, claiming notarization will make these statements true. What is the proper assessment?
- Notarization cures every eligibility defect
- A deed heading alone dispenses with the rule's conditions
- The drafting lawyer may fabricate the required facts
- The proposed recitals do not cure the unmet Rule 74 conditions; counsel must use the appropriate lawful proceedings rather than misstate facts
- The creditor loses its claim when the heirs sign
Legal references
- https://lawphil.net/courts/supreme/rc/rc_72-109_proceedings.html — Rules of Court, Rule 74, sections 1–5.
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.