Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Complaint for Forcible Entry or Unlawful Detainer

Multiple Choice Hard Jurisprudence

Practice question

A complaint alleges that the defendant forcibly displaced the plaintiff's prior physical possession a month ago, but is titled 'Unlawful Detainer' and invents a lease never made. Which correction is proper?
  1. Retain the invented lease to fit the title
  2. A false lease is always harmless
  3. Plead the truthful prior-possession and forcible-deprivation facts under the appropriate cause rather than inventing initial lawful possession
  4. Omit the entry date because timeliness never matters
  5. Claim ownership alone automatically proves forcible entry

Legal references

  • Rules of Court, Rule 70 Sections 1–2, 16; current summary procedure under A.M. No. 08-8-7-SC (March 1, 2022), Rule I Section 1(A)(1)(a), Rule III Sections 1–3: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/assets/pdf/journals/Collation_and_Codification_of_SC_Issuance_DIGITAL.pdf
  • 2019 civil-procedure amendments: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-10-20-sc_2019.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.