Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Justices, Judges, and Court Employees (CJCA, Canon IV, Secs. 16 and 19; 2025 Code of Conduct and Accountability for Court Officials and Personnel, AM 25-06-11-SC, Canon II, Secs. 8–9)

Multiple Choice Medium Jurisprudence

Practice question

A lawyer employed as court personnel obtains only the head of office's approval to accept ordinary private litigation. No Supreme Court authorization exists. Does head-of-office approval alone satisfy the private-practice exception in Section 8?
  1. Yes, because outside-employment approval overrides every restriction
  2. No, Section 8 requires Supreme Court authorization for the private-practice exception
  3. Yes, because all lawyers may privately practice regardless of employment
  4. Yes, if no court facilities are used
  5. Yes, if the work is unpaid

Legal references

  • 2025 Code of Conduct and Accountability for Court Officials and Personnel, A.M. No. 25-06-11-SC, Canon II, Sections 8–9: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/11/100842

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.