Practice question
A lawyer argues that because practice is a privilege, authorities may impose an unconstitutional condition on admission solely by calling it regulation. The condition treats a mere pending accusation as conclusive guilt without individual evaluation. Which is best?
- Every regulatory label defeats the Constitution
- The privilege remains subject to constitutional limits on its conditions
- The conditional nature of practice abolishes presumed innocence
- Every pending complaint proves moral unfitness conclusively
- No good-moral-character requirement may ever exist
Legal references
- In re Taloma, B.M. 4530, December 3, 2025, MAIN decision: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/1/70316
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.