Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Competent Evidence of Identity

Multiple Choice Hard Jurisprudence

Practice question

For an unknown principal, a sole proposed credible witness is personally known to the notary and knows the principal, but is a named beneficiary under the very instrument. Does the witness route work?
  1. Yes, because personal knowledge overrides transactional involvement.
  2. No; a credible identity witness must not be privy to the instrument, document or transaction.
  3. Yes, if the benefit is payable later.
  4. Yes, if the principal agrees to the conflict.
  5. Yes, because only the notary’s interest matters.

Legal references

  • A.M. No. 02-8-13-SC, 2004 Rules on Notarial Practice, Rules III, IV and VI, official collation pp. 1707–1716: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/assets/pdf/journals/Collation_and_Codification_of_SC_Issuance_DIGITAL.pdf
  • A.M. No. 02-8-13-SC, February 19, 2008, Rule II, Section 12(a), official collation p. 1727: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/assets/pdf/journals/Collation_and_Codification_of_SC_Issuance_DIGITAL.pdf
  • R.A. No. 11055, Sections 6(a), 12–14: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2018/ra_11055_2018.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.