Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Competent Evidence of Identity

Multiple Choice Medium Jurisprudence

Practice question

A signatory offers an ordinary government ID with a signature but no photograph, and no special statutory exception or credible-witness route is invoked. Is the signature alone enough under Section 12(a)?
  1. Yes, if the client pays for a certified copy.
  2. Yes, because any government paper automatically qualifies.
  3. Yes, if the notary writes the signatory’s name.
  4. No; the ordinary route requires both photograph and signature.
  5. Yes, because photographs are prohibited.

Legal references

  • A.M. No. 02-8-13-SC, 2004 Rules on Notarial Practice, Rules III, IV and VI, official collation pp. 1707–1716: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/assets/pdf/journals/Collation_and_Codification_of_SC_Issuance_DIGITAL.pdf
  • A.M. No. 02-8-13-SC, February 19, 2008, Rule II, Section 12(a), official collation p. 1727: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/assets/pdf/journals/Collation_and_Codification_of_SC_Issuance_DIGITAL.pdf
  • R.A. No. 11055, Sections 6(a), 12–14: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2018/ra_11055_2018.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.