Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Competent Evidence of Identity

Multiple Choice Hard Jurisprudence

Practice question

A principal presents an authenticated PSN without a physical PhilID. The notary rejects identity proof solely because no physical card is produced. Is that categorical reason consistent with R.A. No. 11055?
  1. No; authenticated PSN and biometrics must be accepted notwithstanding non-presentation of a PhilID.
  2. Yes, a physical card is indispensable under the statute.
  3. Yes, electronic identification is always forbidden.
  4. No, because authentication is never required.
  5. No, because PhilSys eliminates every other notarial requirement.

Legal references

  • A.M. No. 02-8-13-SC, 2004 Rules on Notarial Practice, Rules III, IV and VI, official collation pp. 1707–1716: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/assets/pdf/journals/Collation_and_Codification_of_SC_Issuance_DIGITAL.pdf
  • A.M. No. 02-8-13-SC, February 19, 2008, Rule II, Section 12(a), official collation p. 1727: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/assets/pdf/journals/Collation_and_Codification_of_SC_Issuance_DIGITAL.pdf
  • R.A. No. 11055, Sections 6(a), 12–14: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2018/ra_11055_2018.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.