Philippine Bar review · Topic
Arbitration (RA 9285, Secs. 22 and 33)
Explore Arbitration (RA 9285, Secs. 22 and 33) in Parties and their Agents in Certain Proceedings for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Under RA 9285 Section 22, who may represent a party in an international arbitration conducted in the Philippines? Multiple Choice Easy
- Does RA 9285 Section 22 itself authorize a non-Philippine-Bar representative to appear as counsel in a Philippine court? Multiple Choice Easy
- Through Section 33, does the legal-representation provision in Section 22 also apply to domestic arbitration? Multiple Choice Easy
- A party chooses a foreign lawyer to represent it in an international arbitration held in Manila. The lawyer is not admi… Multiple Choice Medium
- After an arbitration, the same non-Bar representative offers to sign and argue the client’s Philippine court enforcemen… Multiple Choice Medium
- Two Philippine companies conduct a domestic arbitration under RA 9285. One appoints a nonlawyer technical specialist as… Multiple Choice Hard
- An overseas lawyer represents a client in a qualifying Manila arbitration and then invokes that engagement to appear as… Multiple Choice Hard
- Explain the distinction between arbitral representation under RA 9285 and representation as counsel in a Philippine cou… Essay Medium
- Does the representative-of-choice provision extend to domestic arbitration? Explain the statutory route and its limit. Essay Medium
- A foreign lawyer claims that appearing in a Philippine arbitration admits her to the Philippine Bar. Assess the claim. Essay Medium
- Does Section22 itself require the chosen arbitral representative to possess a law degree? Multiple Choice Easy
- Is a party’s representative automatically the arbitrator empowered to render the award? Multiple Choice Easy