Practice question
A properly authorized member represents the government’s interest and uses government personnel solely for that defense. Does Section90(b)(4) itself categorically prohibit the use despite its express qualification?
- No; the stated government-defense qualification must be considered
- Yes; the qualification is nonexistent
- Yes; government defense is always a private client matter
- Only the fee amount matters
- Only the number of staff matters
Legal references
- RA7160 Section90(b)(1)–(4), specific sanggunian-member restrictions and government-defense qualification: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1991/ra_7160_1991.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.