Philippine Bar review · Topic
Responsible Use of Social Media
Explore Responsible Use of Social Media in Propriety (Canon II) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- What duty does CPRA Canon II, Section 36 impose concerning social-media use? Multiple Choice Easy
- Under Section 37, are posts in a restricted privacy setting with an audience outside the lawyer's professional obligati… Multiple Choice Easy
- What is prohibited by Section 39 concerning social-media accounts? Multiple Choice Easy
- A lawyer posts confidential client information in a restricted group and claims privacy settings alone authorize disclo… Multiple Choice Medium
- A lawyer uses an account to communicate about client confidences but takes no steps against unauthorized access, claimi… Multiple Choice Medium
- A potential client gives specific facts during an online forum, and the lawyer gives legal advice on those facts. The l… Multiple Choice Hard
- Counsel privately messages a court officer through social media to influence the officer's performance of official duti… Multiple Choice Hard
- Explain how CPRA Sections 37, 40 and 41 apply to a lawyer's restricted-audience social-media account used for client co… Essay Medium
- Distinguish providing general legal information in an online forum from giving legal advice on specific facts supplied … Essay Medium
- A lawyer knowingly shares false claims and then uses a hidden-identity account to evade the CPRA. Explain the relevant … Essay Medium
- Does Section38’s dissemination prohibition extend to sharing another person’s false statement, rather than only authori… Multiple Choice Easy
- Does Section44 require prudence concerning social-media comments that could violate conflict-of-interest provisions? Multiple Choice Easy