Philippine Bar review · Topic
Preamble; General Provisions
Page 2 of practice questions on Preamble; General Provisions in Duties and Responsibilities of Lawyers (CPRA). Browse published questions and explore related…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Did GeneralProvisions Section2 expressly repeal every section of Rule138, rather than the identified Sections20–37? Multiple Choice Easy
- A lawyer calls the Preamble purely optional aspiration and argues CPRA noncompliance can never carry sanctions. Which i… Multiple Choice Medium
- A litigant invokes the CPRA repealing clause to erase an older Court issuance that is stipulated consistent with CPRA a… Multiple Choice Medium
- In a pending disciplinary case, the respondent declares a personal opt-out because CPRA seems inconvenient, without a S… Multiple Choice Hard
- A lawyer claims the fifteen-day effectivity period runs from signing alone and that publication is irrelevant under Sec… Multiple Choice Hard
- Explain why personal ethical choice in the Preamble does not make the CPRA optional. Essay Hard
- A lawyer treats every pre-CPRA Court issuance as repealed regardless of consistency. Apply GeneralProvisions Section2. Essay Hard
- Explain why the pending-case transitory exception is not a respondent’s unilateral opt-out. Essay Hard