Philippine Bar review · Topic
Clemency
Explore Clemency in Discipline and Disbarment of Lawyers (Canon VI) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Under CPRA Canon VI, Section 47, when may a disbarred lawyer file the specified verified petition for judicial clemency? Multiple Choice Easy
- What evidentiary standard governs the Supreme Court's decision on a judicial-clemency petition under Canon VI, Section … Multiple Choice Easy
- Under Canon VI, Section 49, what happens if a judicial-clemency petition fails to show prima facie merit? Multiple Choice Easy
- A disbarred lawyer relies only on the passage of five years and claims reinstatement is now automatic. Is that correct … Multiple Choice Medium
- A disbarred lawyer seeks clemency despite noncompliance with a prior restitution order. Is compliance with prior discip… Multiple Choice Medium
- A clemency petitioner has waited the required period but offers only a denial that the established misconduct was wrong… Multiple Choice Hard
- A disbarred lawyer seeks clemency in a case with no private offended party. The lawyer otherwise addresses the statutor… Multiple Choice Hard
- A disbarred lawyer says the five-year period under CPRA Canon VI, Section 47 guarantees reinstatement. Explain the diff… Essay Medium
- Identify the reconciliation component of a judicial-clemency petition under Canon VI, Section 48(d), including the alte… Essay Medium
- A clemency petitioner has complied with restitution but presents no evidence of present competence or positive reformat… Essay Medium
- After a prima facie meritorious clemency petition is referred, what period does Canon VI Section 50 give the designated… Multiple Choice Easy
- Does a prima facie merit finding under Section 49 itself finally grant judicial clemency? Multiple Choice Easy