Philippine Bar review · Topic
Burden of Proof and Quantum of Evidence
Explore Burden of Proof and Quantum of Evidence in Discipline and Disbarment of Lawyers (Canon VI) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Under CPRA Canon VI, section 32, who bears the burden of proving the allegations in an administrative disciplinary comp… Multiple Choice Easy
- What quantum of evidence does CPRA Canon VI, section 32 prescribe in administrative disciplinary cases? Multiple Choice Easy
- Which description corresponds to substantial evidence under CPRA Canon VI, section 32? Multiple Choice Easy
- A complainant argues that a lawyer must prove innocence solely because a disciplinary complaint has been docketed. Unde… Multiple Choice Medium
- A respondent demands dismissal solely because the complainant did not prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt. The cas… Multiple Choice Medium
- A client charges a lawyer with retaining entrusted funds. The record includes the lawyer's signed receipt, authenticate… Multiple Choice Hard
- A complainant submits an unsigned anonymous post accusing counsel of deceit. The complainant identifies no author, unde… Multiple Choice Hard
- State the allocation of the burden of proof and the quantum of evidence in lawyer disciplinary proceedings under CPRA C… Essay Medium
- A lawyer asks the disciplinary tribunal to apply the criminal standard of proof because the same alleged act might also… Essay Medium
- A disciplinary complainant offers several documents, but the tribunal finds them unrelated to the charged conduct. The … Essay Medium
- Does Section32 define substantial evidence through relevant evidence rather than any material placed in the file? Multiple Choice Easy
- Does Section32 assign a fixed numerical probability such as exactly 51 percent? Multiple Choice Easy