Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Mandatory Continuing Legal Education (MCLE)

Multiple Choice Hard Jurisprudence

Practice question

A lawyer uses the June 30, 2026 MCLE framework to claim that merely belonging to an exempt job category permits fabrication of a compliance number and removes the need to substantiate status. Which is correct?
  1. Exemption authorizes invented numbers
  2. Proof of exempt status is never needed
  3. Exempt status eliminates every ethical duty
  4. A legitimate exemption must be substantiated through the governing process; it does not authorize false representations
  5. A client can retroactively create an exemption

Legal references

  • https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/1/52844 — B.M. No. 850, October 2, 2001, Revised MCLE Rules, Rules 1–2,5,7,11–12, as operative on June 30, 2026; 2026 replacement took effect after cutoff.
  • https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/sc-updates-rules-on-mandatory-continuing-legal-education/ — Official SC confirmation that the April 22, 2026 replacement MCLE Rules took effect September 15, 2026 (effectivity check only; post-cutoff rules not applied).

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.