Practice question
May Medado’s particular one-year delay and fine be treated as an automatic sanction for every current failure to sign the Roll?
- Yes, the facts and current governing rules never matter.
- No.
- Yes, every future case has an identical mandatory amount.
- Yes, the decision authorizes practice while waiting.
- Yes, the Court’s admission authority ended with that case.
Legal references
- A.M. No. 24-10-05-SC, August 12, 2025, amended Rule 138, effective November 3, 2025, Sections 2, 11-13 and 16-19 as identified: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/pdf/am_24-10-05-sc_2025.pdf
- In re Petition to Sign in the Roll of Attorneys, Michael A. Medado, B.M. No. 2540, September 24, 2013, EN BANC MAIN resolution, corporate legal practice and incomplete admission (not a universal current sanction tariff): https://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2013/sep2013/bm_2540_2013.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.