Philippine Bar review · Topic
Good Moral Character
Explore Good Moral Character in Admission to the Bar (Rule 138, as amended by AM 24-10-05-SC) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Under amended Rule 138 Section 2, must an applicant produce satisfactory evidence of good moral character? Multiple Choice Easy
- What does amended Section 2 require concerning pending charges involving moral turpitude at application? Multiple Choice Easy
- Does Taloma treat the mere filing of a criminal charge as conclusive proof of an applicant’s wrongdoing? Multiple Choice Easy
- An applicant candidly discloses a newly filed charge. The evaluator recommends denial solely because a complaint exists… Multiple Choice Medium
- A Bar applicant has a trial-court conviction involving moral turpitude under appeal. Is the Court necessarily powerless… Multiple Choice Medium
- A successful examinee argues that presumed innocence guarantees immediate admission regardless of every other item bear… Multiple Choice Hard
- An applicant is admitted after an individualized assessment of a pending case and later suffers final conviction of a c… Multiple Choice Hard
- Explain the relationship between disclosure of pending moral-turpitude charges and the presumption of innocence in curr… Essay Medium
- Under Taloma, what role should the OBC perform when a pending case is raised against an applicant? Essay Medium
- Does permitting an applicant with a pending case to take the oath resolve that criminal case or foreclose later profess… Essay Medium
- Does amended Rule 138, Section 2 confine the relevant final moral-turpitude adjudications to Philippine courts alone? Multiple Choice Easy
- An applicant has no final adverse moral-turpitude decision. Does that fact alone necessarily supply satisfactory affirm… Multiple Choice Easy